<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Minutes of Dylan Patel on five nanometer</title>
    <link>https://minutesof.com/dylan-patel/on/five-nanometer/</link>
    <description>Everything Dylan Patel has said on five nanometer: 2 verbatim quotes from October 2023, each with a timestamp and a link to the recording it came from.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 16:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://minutesof.com/dylan-patel/on/five-nanometer/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Patel argues the unrestricted 1980i tool can reach five nanometer with only modest cost increases on total chi</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/72d16d9a-f03c-4f62-aadb-daaecf589490/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/72d16d9a-f03c-4f62-aadb-daaecf589490/</guid>
      <description>“And many folks including, not just myself, but many folks in the industry as well think that the 1980i could be used for five nanometer, right?” — Hidden Forces</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>five nanometer</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patel calculates doubling lithography cost only increases total chip cost 10 percent, enabling five nanometer.</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/a81c789d-69a2-44e4-83c3-7fc48f4f956d/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/a81c789d-69a2-44e4-83c3-7fc48f4f956d/</guid>
      <description>“Because again, the manufacturing cost of lithography is only one fourth to one fifth. So if you double lithography costs, you&#x27;re only increasing the total cost of a chip by 10%, right?” — Hidden Forces</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>five nanometer</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
