<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ai regulation: everyone on the record — The Minutes</title>
    <link>https://minutesof.com/on/ai-regulation/</link>
    <description>Everyone on the record about ai regulation: 8 verbatim quotes from 3 people, June 2024 to August 2026, in one chronology, each with a timestamp and a link…</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 22:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://minutesof.com/on/ai-regulation/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>David Sacks: Sacks argues applying FAA-style regulation to AI would immediately eliminate Anthropic&#x27;s competit</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/a2ba80df-2c22-489c-a267-ee3e88591005/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/a2ba80df-2c22-489c-a267-ee3e88591005/</guid>
      <description>“You&#x27;re gonna apply that regulatory framework to AI model releases? Game over. Forget about it. Your six months will be gone like that.” — David Sacks, All-In Podcast</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Sacks: Sacks notes FAA certification takes a minimum of five years, contrasting with AI release cycles.</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/09a35ccb-c66d-4170-af84-a83c0ba3233b/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/09a35ccb-c66d-4170-af84-a83c0ba3233b/</guid>
      <description>“You know how long it takes the FAA to certify and approve a new model, in this case for airframes? Minimum of five years.” — David Sacks, All-In Podcast</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Sacks: Sacks claims Dario&#x27;s regulatory vision would have prevented Anthropic from achieving a successful</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/75132a0d-c0f4-4693-a21e-1fcc139a27ef/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/75132a0d-c0f4-4693-a21e-1fcc139a27ef/</guid>
      <description>“Because I think if he had if he had realized his dream of this highly regulated AI apparatus, I don&#x27;t think that company would be set up for a hugely successful IPO.” — David Sacks, All-In Podcast</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Friedberg: Friedberg argues California&#x27;s AI legislation failed because government rules couldn&#x27;t keep pa</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/498d3855-3b03-4d93-af19-c83ec92559ea/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/498d3855-3b03-4d93-af19-c83ec92559ea/</guid>
      <description>“But fast forward a year, none of those kind of rules and requirements actually map to the technology of the day.” — David Friedberg, All-In Podcast</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bill Gurley: I think what could happen with AI is we could build a fence around ourselves, and China could end</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/83ecd26c-a88f-4bdb-8672-337576a8c048/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/83ecd26c-a88f-4bdb-8672-337576a8c048/</guid>
      <description>“I think what could happen with AI is we could build a fence around ourselves, and China could end up serving the rest of the world.” — Bill Gurley, Tom Bilyeu</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bill Gurley: Gurley argues Anthropic and OpenAI seek regulation to handicap startups and open source competito</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/ffc48012-9190-40a1-87fa-32418d245252/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/ffc48012-9190-40a1-87fa-32418d245252/</guid>
      <description>“I think for certain reason Anthropic and OpenAI are begging for regulation is so that they can write rules that make it harder for startups, open source models to be competitive with them, which I think is very rational for them to do, but I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s good for society.” — Bill Gurley, On with Kara Swisher</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 15:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bill Gurley: Gurley argues AI crimes are already illegal under existing laws, questioning need for new regulat</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/5fc25346-6183-45ad-822f-b45bdec72880/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/5fc25346-6183-45ad-822f-b45bdec72880/</guid>
      <description>“If I defraud you with AI, it&#x27;s still illegal as it would have been if I&#x27;d have done it with a phishing scam before AI. And so there why do we need new laws?” — Bill Gurley, Forbes</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bill Gurley: Gurley observes the biggest AI doomers have the largest financial stakes in foundational models.</title>
      <link>https://minutesof.com/q/e3035ed9-a1ef-43dc-aec4-ddf0487b3dc3/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://minutesof.com/q/e3035ed9-a1ef-43dc-aec4-ddf0487b3dc3/</guid>
      <description>“It&#x27;s remarkably interesting that the biggest doomers are the ones that have the biggest financial stakes and the biggest foundational model.” — Bill Gurley, Forbes</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>ai regulation</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
