Who is on this subjectordered by the date of their first quote here
2 of 3 lanes rest on fewer than 5 quotes and are marked thin. Offsets are days from the middle first-quote date, 2 Oct 2025 — a date, and nothing else. It is not a claim about who reached a view first.
-
Bill Gurley
5
7 Mar 2024 – 13 Jul 2026
-574 d
-
Howard Lutnick
1
thin
2 Oct 2025 – 2 Oct 2025
+0 d
-
Scott Bessent
2
thin
20 Aug 2026 – 20 Aug 2026
+322 d
The chronologysourced and dated, oldest first
-
-
Bill Gurley
Gurley says lawyers in Delaware derivative suit against Tesla are asking for five to six billion dollars in payment.
“One one data point you you left out, which came up recently, is the lawyers that that pursued this case are asking for 5 or $6,000,000,000 in payment.”
-
Bill Gurley
Gurley questions how a plaintiff with only nine shares can justify multibillion-dollar lawyer fees in Delaware case.
“So how could how could a client with nine shares lead to a multibillion dollar award to a lawyer?”
-
-
-
Bill Gurley
Gurley cites research showing Delaware awards attorney fee multiples 23x to 57x more frequently than federal courts.
“in Delaware, seven times or higher is 23 times more likely than in a federal court. And 10 times or higher is 57 times or higher than in a federal court.”
-
Bill Gurley
Gurley reveals 55% of high-multiplier Delaware cases are assigned to just two judges including the chancellor who assigns cases.
“It turns out that in the 20 cases where you have this this super high multiplier, 55% of the cases are just two of the judges.”
-
Howard Lutnick
Lutnick speculates Epstein traded blackmail videos for his lenient sentence.
“I assume way back when Mhmm. They traded those videos in exchange for him getting that eighteen month sentence.”
-
-
-
Bill Gurley
Gurley cites Neil Cotchill using AI throughout Supreme Court tariff case preparation, making top lawyer run faster.
“I was just at Ted and Neil Cotchill, who is one of the most famous lawyers in the world, he just argued the case where they beat the tariff in front of the Supreme Court.”
-
Scott Bessent
Bessent says Democratic attorneys general sought to return tariff money to corporations, calling it corporate welfare.
“Democratic attorney generals who filed a ridiculous lawsuit against this administration wanted the money to go back to the payer of record, So that is corporate welfare.”
-
Scott Bessent
Bessent says Section 301 tariffs, which survived over 5,000 lawsuits, will restore the tariff income to government.
“But the using the three o ones, which have survived more than 5,000 suits, that we will get that tariff income back.”
-