Who is on this subjectordered by the date of their first quote here
2 of 3 lanes rest on fewer than 5 quotes and are marked thin. Offsets are days from the middle first-quote date, 19 Sep 2020 — a date, and nothing else. It is not a claim about who reached a view first.
- Sir Richard Dearlove 5 11 Oct 2019 – 11 Oct 2019 -344 d
-
David Friedberg
1
thin
19 Sep 2020 – 19 Sep 2020
+0 d
-
Howard Lutnick
2
thin
1 Oct 2025 – 1 Oct 2025
+1838 d
The chronologysourced and dated, oldest first
-
-
Sir Richard Dearlove
Dearlove describes arriving in Washington within days of 9/11 to pledge British intelligence support to shocked U.S. officials.
“Intelligence community, I think meeting the President at the time, and really pledging British support to The U. S. In response to this extraordinary attack.”
-
Sir Richard Dearlove
Dearlove reveals intelligence agencies knew from intercept chatter in June 2001 that something big was being planned.
“And the senior cohorts of FBI and CIA had flown down to meet us, and this was in June. And we knew from the noise, not from specific humid, from the noise.”
-
Sir Richard Dearlove
Dearlove says intelligence community knew from chatter something big was planned before 9/11 but lacked specifics.
“And we knew from the noise, not from specific humid, from the noise. By noise you mean chatter on Chatter on intercept and chatter that something big was being planned.”
-
Sir Richard Dearlove
Dearlove says intelligence knew something big was planned before 9/11 but not the specifics.
“we knew from the noise, not from specific humid, from the noise. By noise you mean chatter on Chatter on intercept and chatter that something big was being planned.”
-
Sir Richard Dearlove
Dearlove argues the 1993 World Trade Center bombing provided a clue to the target eight years before 9/11.
“And what I'm saying is that we had a clue to the target in 'ninety three.”
-
-
-
David Friedberg
Friedberg compares COVID response to post-9/11 changes, arguing behavioral shifts persist regardless of actual risk levels.
“It has nothing to do with science. Like, after nine eleven, there were no more serious, like, terrorist attacks on The United States, but our fucking lives changed dramatically.”
-
-
-
Howard Lutnick
Lutnick says three out of four new hires agreed to give 25 percent of their salary to 9/11 families.
“I go, But, I have to send 50,000 to the family so I can only pay you $150,000 Right. So, only one out of four turned it down. Three out of four said, okay.”
-
Howard Lutnick
Lutnick gave employees who contributed 25% of payroll post-9/11 double their contribution from IPO proceeds plus stock.
“we take a company of ours public, and it's the weirdest deal on Wall Street, because I give my shares double what each of those people gave.”
-