Sacks endorses Zuckerberg's framing that the defining question is whether superintelligence access will be centralized or universal
“Mark Zuckerberg gets it right: “The defining question of our age isn’t whether superintelligence will exist, but who will have access to it. Will it be centralized and restricted to a few institutions, or will it be a tool that empowers everyone?” Concentration of power is the https://t.co/kFgkv5dlwF”
Sacks endorses Zuckerberg's framing that the defining question is whether superintelligence access will be centralized or universal
“Mark Zuckerberg gets it right: “The defining question of our age isn’t whether superintelligence will exist, but who will have access to it. Will it be centralized and restricted to a few institutions, or will it be a tool that empowers everyone?” Concentration of power is the https://t.co/kFgkv5dlwF”
Sacks argues bio risks can be addressed by regulating DNA synthesis at physical chokepoints rather than creating new regulatory agencies
“@JTLonsdale Bio is an area of concern, but that doesn’t require a new rule-making agency with expansive powers. We can regulate DNA synthesis at the physical chokepoint, as this letter proposes. Targeted solutions for specific risks is better than new bureaucracies. https://t.co/mD5LEovKZK”